Here's the first slide on that from yesterday's lecture
school shootings in Marysville, WA, she said, for example. One way to proceed, we said, is for Keely to figure out what aspect of the shooting is most interesting or compelling to her. Maybe it's the idea that the shooter was a "very loved child" and really cared about his friends, as the linked article notes. So is it the idea that he killed people--his friends--but didn't seem like a killer? And that even after he killed at least two of his friends he still doesn't seem like a killer?
That's one piece of the two-piece topic. Now, what course material would help explain this interesting specific part of the "headline" piece? (Remember that specific is important.) Are there characters that seem nice but kill anyway? Mr. Cubitt tried to kill Abe Slaney, and he's almost a saint. Eileen Wade? She kills, but is originally quite a nice idealistic person. There may be clues to the Marysville situation in Chandler's analysis of Eileen Wade. or some other character . . .
A similar process would work for 1 and 3 as well--starting with a passage (1) or issue (3) you really like, and thinking of the topic that emerges (1) or a course analogy (3).
Come see us!